Turing test brings up many questions crucial to philosophy of mind. It was designed by a British logician Alan Turing and remains a challenge both to artificial intelligence creators and philosophers. Turing test, despite rumours, still has not been passed although more than half a century has passed since Alan Turing’s death. But what is in fact Turing test? The original aim of Turing test was to see if a machine could think. A machine in order to pass Turing test, would have to be able to engage in a conversation with a man and respond to his questions in a way which would resemble human responses so much that the man would not be able to reliably distinguish between a machine and a real human being.
Turing’s idea, while fascinating, is also a very controversial one. What does it mean to think? Is our brain just a very sophisticated machine which – with a sufficient scientific progress – could be recreated with wires instead of neurons? Many monists would argue so. Alan Turing replaced the original question “Can machines think?” with “Are there imaginable digital computers which would do well in the imitation game?”. Then we encounter another problem – could we, hypothetically, be not able to tell the difference between living organisms and machines?